JollyToad.com

Home

Real Progress

Looking after the Mudball

Frugal Frog

Personal Freedom

Consumer Activism

Stories

 

THE GREAT UNLEARNING

On the Path of Wisdom

By George Sranko

(Written as a look "back" from the Year 2050…)

"In the late part of the twentieth century, humanity has run up against a fundamental barrier to its advancement -- itself. We are a more dangerous animal than we would like to think, but we can also change more than we might have dreamed, by calling on some of the very many diverse mental abilities within ourselves. If we learn how we think, how our mind is structured, and how to overcome the innate limitations and biases of mind, can we then learn to act on that knowledge?"
Robert Ornstein and Paul Ehrlich, New World, New Mind, 1989.

"We need not return to the past; we will not build the values of the learning society by looking in a rearview mirror. To the contrary, we must have the courage to boldly define wisdom in terms of the new economic link between learning and work. Seldom has human society faced such abrupt, profound changes. Indeed, post-industrial society, if it is to improve our lot, may be known as not the Information Age, but as the Age of Wisdom."
Robert Aubrey and Paul Cohen, Working Wisdom, 1995.

***

Philosophers, mystics and spiritual leaders throughout the ages have made a distinction between the inner world and the outer (while acknowledging that any such distinction is merely an illusion!). The 20th century could be characterized as the century dedicated to "perfecting and manifesting the outer, material world." At the risk of oversimplification, the majority worldview could have been stated as; "What you see is not only what you get -- its all there is!" We might be tempted to describe this as a century "tall on innovation and intellect but short on wisdom." It became painfully obvious during the 1980s and 90s that wisdom had been relegated to the back of the line, behind fame, fortune, good looks and a bad attitude (and worse yet, a big gun). An exaggeration? Perhaps, but only slightly.

At the end of the second millennium we found ourselves staring through eyes of flesh and blood at the barren, unyielding wall constructed from a strictly mechanical world view. We had come about as far as linear, rational scientific thinking alone could take us without causing irreparable harm to ourselves and to our natural world.

One might ask, "what was the determining influence in successfully shifting humanity's course from impending environmental and social breakdown towards a sustainable and more harmonious existence with one another and all life on earth?" There were, of course, inestimable numbers of influences, however, in a nutshell, the defining shift took place, not in the outer world, but in human consciousness. Looking back on this period, many have called this "the Great Unlearning."

As we all know, people at the turn of the 20th century were suffocating under the weight of rapidly accumulating knowledge -- reports, faxes, e-mail correspondence, websites, newspapers, magazines, radio and TV broadcasts. Increasingly suffering from the stress of overload, people began to shake their heads wondering if "info-bingeing" was what life was really all about. Like T.S. Eliot, they began to wonder, "Where is the knowledge we have lost in information? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?"

With heads crammed full -- people found themselves feeling more empty than ever before. With bittersweet irony many realized they were living a life best described by the name of the popular board game, Trivial Pursuit!

More and more people felt like they were "dancing with an elephant" and powerless to influence either the music or the dance! The teachings of the masters and sages -- from Jesus and Buddha to Gandhi and Mother Teresa -- were inspiring but often paradoxical. They all seemed to say the same thing: that the way to true inner peace and understanding -- the way of radical transformation -- could only begin with the emptying of the mind! To many people at the time this was simply meaningless "New Age" babble… they could not conceive of the possibility that there could be anything beyond the mind.

"To be independent in this true sense, we have to forget everything which we have in our mind and discover something quite new and different moment after moment. This is how we live in this world. So we say true understanding will come out of emptiness.
When you have something in your consciousness you do not have perfect composure. The best way towards perfect composure is to forget everything. Then your mind is calm, and it is wide and clear enough to see and feel things as they are without any effort."

-- Zen Master Shunryu Suzuki.

Throughout history, the extraordinary significance of this understanding had eluded the vast majority of humanity. However, by the turn of the Millennium, sufficient numbers were experiencing glimmers of realization to reach a critical mass and trigger a "quantum leap" in human consciousness. Catching up with the empirical proof of both mystics and leading-edge scientists, average people began to understand that the very act of observing the world around us creates our reality. Humanity suddenly found itself at a new threshold when enough people realized that, in fact, separation (I versus the world) is an impossibility and has always been an illusion created by our minds to try and bring order and understanding to an infinite, chaotic universe.

In an article in Scientific American in 1979 Bernard d'Espagnat wrote, "The doctrine that the world is made up of objects whose existence is independent of human consciousness turns out to be in conflict with quantum mechanics and with facts established by experiment."

What follows is a brief overview of the common understanding that unfolded and swept the world during the early years of the new Millenium, leading to "The Great Unlearning" followed by the "Giant Leap Towards Humanity" that we are experiencing today, half-way through the 21st century.

  1. Like all life forms, human beings and, therefore, human consciousness is evolving.
  2. Just as individuals mature in consciousness, humanity has passed through several phases of consciousness, each phase incorporating and transcending the previous phase. Broadly speaking, these could best be described as the physical, the biological, the mental and the realm of spirit (or, as Ken Wilber refers to them, physiosphere, biosphere, noosphere and theosphere).
  3. Relatively early in our personal evolutions, we each fabricate a mental shell to protect our individual identities. This shell -- our ego -- forms a barrier or protective membrane, with a zone of safety within, against the chaos and danger of the Great Unknown out there.
  4. Identifying ourselves entirely with "our minds and bodies," as an ego-centric viewer we cannot perceive this barrier or membrane that we've erected even though it filters and determines our experience of the outside world. These barriers are built from material of the past, being based entirely on our own past experiences and those of other people (through learning from others).
  5. Having a well-defined ego -- with its protective barrier and sense of separation -- has been essential to our survival in the past, during previous phases of human evolution. As usual, however, what was once a self-protective characteristic essential to our survival as individuals in the past now threatens our ability to survive as a species unless we learn how to move forward to integrate higher levels of consciousness.
  6. As members of society, with shared cultural norms and languages, we also tend to build a series of more encompassing barriers around our family, our community, our region, our nation, our religion, our company, etc., etc. There are always plenty of barriers to go around and even more where those came from! We bang these barriers together to form the social and economic structures that we are familiar with -- our political and legal systems (e.g., political parties, national laws, consensus models, republics, federations, monarchies, etc.), economic systems (corporate laws, tax laws, consumer laws, etc.), and social systems (work place rules, family structures, social conventions, etc.).
    As on a personal scale, these systems and structures largely determine our worldviews as a society. They establish our experience of the landscape we our traveling through, just as surely as our mode of transportation does, whether it is by bike, bus or boat. Cultural structures are just as invisible to most of us as our individual egos are to ourselves.
    As with our individual egos, our social structures have allowed us to reap the many benefits of current technological advancement and material success. To continue to rely on the old structures, however, would prove disastrous as we watch our aggressive, consumptive behaviour overwhelm the planet -- at horrendous environmental and social costs. We have no choice but to learn to integrate current structures and to transcend them in developing entirely new structures.
  7. Existing social structures can be fine-tuned and revitalized to a certain extent, however, like all structures they ultimately have a limited life span. It has become apparent that we've outgrown some of the fundamental premises -- the very foundations that our current structures are built upon – premises such as:
    · prosperity is absolutely dependent on continuous economic growth
    · the earth's bounty is unlimited
    · natural capital is free and, therefore, does not have to be factored into economic calculations
    · human actions are too localized in scale to have a significant influence on planetary life support systems, such as climatic regimes, ocean currents, or stratospheric conditions.
  8. Only individuals who have arrived at a certain level of maturity will perceive the need for change… however, that does not diminish in any way the need for change.
  9. The very fact that we have been so successful as a species has brought us to the point where we have outgrown our structures -- our exoskeletons -- and somewhat like caterpillars, must go within and begin entirely anew as butterflies. A caterpillar can never hope to fly, no matter what contortions it might demand of itself.
    Before we can sufficiently transform our social structures, we must transform ourselves -- raising our individual levels of awareness -- and thereby increasing global consciousness. When enough of us have changed the way we view and interact with the world outside; the world will change. We must "unlearn" some of our most cherished concepts and pampered premises and undertake an inner transformation that will manifest in outward change.
  10. The most important question becomes: "How do we learn to integrate body, mind and spirit and move beyond the world of duality (not through exclusion, but by inclusion) and learn to directly experience realms that transcend the rational mind?" Not, how do we discard the body and mind and move to the level of spirit? -- but rather how do we integrate all aspects of ourselves and move to an entirely new level?
  11. The answer is to let go of our assuredness and certainty about the world -- our world-ego and our knowledge -- and to develop the sensitivity to simply observe as openly as possible. To let go of our knowledge and our egos and open ourselves to direct experience of ultimate reality -- pure essence, unadulterated by culture, creed or mental construct -- through contemplation.
    In this way we can develop the inner space we need to absorb new realities and perceive new possibilities. Only through a conscious decision to set out on our own personal evolutionary path can we bring true wisdom to bear upon our personal and worldly affairs. Those who realize this and act accordingly are on the path of wisdom. (We could also say that those who realize this but do not act, have much to unlearn!)

***

"The time has now arrived when man has sufficiently matured to experience a reality which has hitherto belonged solely to the realm of faith.
….Our generation is witness to a decisive turning point in man's development -- the opening of the initiatory Way, formerly the exclusive province of the mystics, to all those who have arrived at this level of maturity."

-- Karlfried G. Durckheim, The Way of Transformation.

"Working on the Way breaks down into three essential tasks:
1. Developing the sensitivity needed for contact with Being.
2. Gaining the insight into the conditions on which the experience of Being depends.
3. Practicing to eliminate everything that separates us from Being and develop everything that connects us with it. The purpose of this is to achieve an overall state (including the body) that enables us to stay in touch with Being and manifest it in the world."

-- Karlfried G. Durckheim, Absolute Living

 

Catch-22: It takes wisdom to see the need for wisdom

Not only does each individual go through developmental stages of self-consciousness but human consciousness, like any biological or organizational system, is in a constant state of evolution. We need only consider the social and technological achievements of the past century to see how rapidly our knowledge and abilities have evolved. Ken Wilber describes this well;

"In any developmental or growth sequence, as a more encompassing stage or holon emerges, it includes the capacities and patterns and functions of the previous stage, and then adds its own unique (and more encompassing) capacities.

Thus, whatever the important value of the previous stage, the new stage has that enfolded in its own makeup, plus something extra (more integrative capacity, for example), and that "something extra" means "extra value" relative to the previous (and less encompassing) stage. This crucial definition of a "higher stage" was first introduced in the West by Aristotle and in the East by Shankara and Lieh-tzu; it has been central to developmental studies ever since." (Ken Wilber, 1995)

One of the keys to understanding the value of wisdom in human endeavour is this idea of a constantly evolving "higher stage." Once we accept the notion that human consciousness is evolving, we must continually ask ourselves, "what does the next stage in evolution look like?" Following this line of thought we can see that each higher level of consciousness should, in turn, prove more valuable (to humanity as a whole) than the preceding stage. As Wilber points out; "Conventional thought is more valuable than preconventional thought in establishing a balanced moral response (and postconventional is even more valuable, and so on)."

At first glance this notion of a hierarchy of consciousness was difficult for many people to accept. After all, wasn't modern society built on a foundation of fundamental "equality for all?" However it soon became evident that attainment of higher levels of consciousness was not all that different from achievement in education. Education -- which promotes a hierarchy of learning and knowledge -- is fundamental to the capacity and functioning of most modern societies. Individuals who have attained higher levels of education are usually highly valued and respected by society. Indeed, the success of any democratic society ultimately rests on having a relatively high percentage of educated, informed and participative citizens.

In the late 1990s, however, there was a great gulf between the recognition and acceptance of a hierarchy of consciousness and actually having the systems in place to capitalize on wisdom in our political, social and educational circles.

The state of the fish populations and forests in Canada during this time are perfect examples of the lack of wisdom all around. On the east coast, the cod had largely been wiped out after years of over-fishing and mismanagement. Only a few short years later the west coast faced a similar situation when coho salmon stocks faced extinction. In exemplary short-sighted fashion almost everyone involved -- many consumers, commercial fishers, sport fishers, and fisheries managers -- wanted to continue fishing for coho! Who could fathom taking the last coho and then wondering what to do about salmon stocks in the future?!

The same saga of shortsightedness plagued the forest industry for most of the century. On Vancouver Island, for example, thirteen per cent of the island had been protected from logging… (after bitter protests and years of confrontation), but only about four per cent of the forests were included in the protected areas. The rest of the island was basically slated for clearcutting. Forest companies, shareholders and loggers were demanding access to virtually the last stick of wood without thinking about what they would do when the wood was gone. People with varying levels of education -- including some very "bright" individuals -- and various backgrounds and interests all managed to demonstrate a remarkable lack of wisdom.

The stage was set for the emergence of philosophies and disciplines such as integral studies, systems theory, holistic management, etc.

***

One area of human endeavour soon came to stand out above the others in terms of integrating wisdom into the functioning of society. With an aging population, the area of greatest concern for many people became one of the most important catalysts for valuing wisdom in society (to complement linear, rational thinking)… and that was human health and aging. A large majority of the population found themselves entering the fall and winter of their lives at the turn of the Millennium. Health and aging took on greater significance for everyone -- both the elder folk facing their twilight years and the younger generations looking after them.

In the 1980s and 90s many medical professionals began to realize that the age-old challenges of health, aging and death demanded that the musty curtains held aloft by western medical science, screening the deepest mysteries of the universe, had to be flung aside. A few doctors began to write books that crossed the boundary of time and space to enter into the territory of boundless wisdom. Perhaps one of the most popular writers at the time was Deepak Chopra. In his book Ageless Body, Timeless Mind he wrote, "Spirit is healing energy, the flow of life and intelligence in every cell. When we are once more attuned to the innate joy and delight of our bodies, the signals of deep wisdom will reappear, creating healing from within."

***

Wisdom is a familiar word, yet a definitive meaning is difficult to pin down. It carries with it a sense of "knowing" – intuiting or perceiving -- the right path or choice, often without the benefit of time and under very difficult circumstances. An Indian adage holds, "This is not the kind of knowledge you acquire but the kind you must become."

This much is certain; wisdom is much more than a mere collection of facts… of information. We all recognize a hierarchical organization when it comes to the "stuff of mind," increasing in usefulness; going from mere information, or straight data, to knowledge and then wisdom. Take nitroglycerin for example; the chemical formula is information; the process of combining the ingredients in exactly the right manner requires knowledge; however, the use of nitroglycerin for good rather than evil takes a certain amount of wisdom. (It seems appropriate that the Nobel prize – quite likely the most respected recognition of wisdom – is named after Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite.)

Where does this ability to know the truth or perceive the right path come from? Are we born with innate wisdom? Do we slowly hew wisdom out of the tangled experiences that we collect during the course of our lives? Are we suddenly blessed with wisdom when the first grey hairs appear unbidden? (Or is it simply a survival mechanism for parents in response to the clever manipulations of our children?)

Yes, no doubt. But, of course, there is more.

What is the difference between being smart, or intelligent, and being wise? In commonly accepted terms, intelligence is a measure of the ability of the intellect. Wisdom, however, is a measure of some capacity that transcends the intellect. It is a powerful mix of intelligence, humour, personal experience, common sense, insight, and intuition. All of these characteristics contribute to wisdom. This is why the exact nature of wisdom is so difficult to describe. It takes a certain amount of wisdom to appreciate the true power of wisdom!

"The ignorant man is not the unlearned, but he who does not know himself, and the learned man is stupid when he relies on books, on knowledge and on authority to give him understanding. Understanding comes only through self knowledge, which is awareness of one's total psychological process. Thus education, in the true sense, is the understanding of oneself, for it is within each one of us that the whole of existence is gathered." 
-- J. Krishnamurti

Perhaps wisdom could be defined as the innate human ability that allows us to see beyond the separation and duality of the time/space world we inhabit with our physical bodies, to realize the indivisible, absolute truth. Through wisdom we become directly aware of the infinite universe – both empty and immensely full -- and we comprehend that it is more glorious than we could have ever imagined.

The salient point is the fact that wisdom signifies a level of insight or appreciation of context that can only be grasped once a new level of consciousness has been achieved. To put it into physical terms; we can't see the next ridge until we ascend to the top of the ridge we're currently climbing. This simple truth explains many of the difficulties that faced humanity at the close of the 20th Century. No matter how much evidence accumulated to show that the majority of ecosystems on earth were under extreme stress… individuals required a sufficient level of awareness to perceive the interconnected and complex nature of the "multi-layered web of life" that was threatened. For decades large numbers of people simply denied that there were any real threats to the environment -- because from their vantage point there were none to be seen!

It soon became evident that the those espousing a "laissez faire" approach to free market economies and unrestrained resource exploitation without factoring in the environmental or social costs were demonstrating a woeful lack of wisdom! They were either unable to perceive the overall impacts and both social and environmental consequences or they "refused" to perceive them for the sake of short-term convenience and opportunity. The integrative wisdom that was beginning to arise was based on an understanding that any separation between humanity and the environment was merely an illusion.

In the late twentieth century, and early twenty-first, those fixated on measuring success through strictly economic terms -- the accepted worldview of the time -- were tremendously challenged by this notion and lashed out vociferously against its proponents.

However, once it began, the shift was rapid. For example John Dalla Costa, a Canadian management consultant wrote in his book Working Wisdom, "…we tend to see bottom line as something different from culture, potential, or human values. Even those who acknowledge a relationship between wisdom factors and profit often still separate these two concepts. They are, in fact, increasingly symbiotic. Hamel and Prahalad note that 'when the pace of genetic evolution falls behind the pace of environmental change, a species, like the dinosaurs, can get wiped out. The corporate equivalent is wholesale layoffs and massive restructuring. Only with anticipatory unlearning can one hope for a bloodless revolution.' The unlearning most needed is that of regarding wisdom and profit as divergent."

In the end, it was this shift in perception -- from wisdom as a threat to the bottom line, to a recognition that, in fact, it was essential to a truly sustainable marketplace -- that represented a fundamental revolution in thinking.

"If business systems and ecosystems have something fundamental in common, there is disconcerting news for bosses. 'The first rule of complex systems is that it is almost impossible to predict who is a friend and who is an enemy,' says Pimm [Stuart Pimm, Ecologist, University of Tennessee]. He describes field experiments in which a predator is removed from a community. You might expect its prey, species A, to thrive. But about half the time species A suffers because the predator has another prey, species B, competing with species A. With the population of species B no longer kept in check by the predator, it may even push species A to local extinction.
Business ecosystems face the same problem of deciding who is a friend and who is an enemy. And the bad news doesn't stop here. 'When everything is connected directly or indirectly to everything else, changes in one part of the system may be propagated throughout,' says Pimm. 'Sometimes species may go extinct through no fault of their own.'
To executives who are used to at least the illusion of predictability and control, this is all unnerving. 'We know from studying complex systems that prediction in any conventional sense is not possible,' author Moore [The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems, James F. Moore] warns. 'The effective leaders I meet are the ones who are prepared to let go of the illusion of control,' he says. 'And that's a good thing, because in reality they have no choice.'"

— Roger Lewin, New Scientist, London, Nov. 29,1997.

Those who possess wisdom have the ability to see clearly beyond what might be immediately obvious to the greater, more inclusive truth (and the more consequential context in influencing the unfolding of events) and to act accordingly in the present moment. The recognition and valuing of this perspective essentially changed humanity's ability to deal with incredibly complex natural and social processes, often occurring on a global scale. For with wisdom, as we have seen, came the worldview that everything was interconnected and people needed to develop the ability to think and act from this deeply held understanding.

This was the ultimate challenge for humanity: …to stop living in the short term, reacting to relatively localized, short-lived phenomenon and to learn to act in harmony with global events and processes with significant long-term consequences. Each person was being called upon to learn to perceive "the greater whole" and to consciously consider the big picture as well as the common good before each and every action.

The contemplative traditions paved the way for humanity as a whole to stop merely talking about wisdom and to actually experience the absolute directly. By the 2020s certain characteristics had become more and more common in people around the world. People began to experience:

recognition and acceptance of a state of being that transcends the ego -- with more and more reports of direct experiencing of this state, if even for a few fleeting moments
increasing compassion for one another and for all living creatures on earth
a union of head, heart and spirit in daily affairs and minute-by-minute calculations
a willingness to "unlearn" or let go of knowledge (based on the past) that was often irrelevant and to allow actions that arose spontaneously in response to current realities and the bigger picture
greater foresight and caution about interfering with natural processes and systems that could never be entirely understood; not only for the sake of current generations, but also for generations yet to come
a realization that we live in an observer-created reality; and how we choose to observe or measure the world actually changes the world itself
a willingness to let go of a need to control other people or specific outcomes

Looking back from the mid-21st century, we can now see that the biggest transformation in human nature occurred when people began to admit to one another how little "what-they-thought-they-knew" really meant. Once humanity entered the period of "great unlearning" the possibility for real transformation increased a thousand-fold. People in the late twentieth century were amazed by some of the sweeping changes they had witnessed in a relatively few short years; the fall of the Berlin wall, the dismantling of apartheid in South Africa, and the bloodless revolution in the USSR and eastern Europe. Nothing they had witnessed, however, could have prepared them for the massive contextual shifts and the changes in human consciousness they were to experience with the coming of the new Millennium. Vaclav Havel's words, written in 1998, now seem prophetic of the years ahead:

"It is my deep conviction that the only option is a change in the sphere of the spirit, in the sphere of human conscience, in the actual attitude of man toward the world. It is not enough to invent new machines, new regulations, or new institutions. We must understand differently and more perfectly the true purpose of our existence on this earth. Only such understanding will allow the development of new models of behavior, new scales of values and life objectives. In short: it appears to me that it would be better to start from the head rather than the tail."
-- Vaclav Havel, Civilization, April/May 1998.

-###-

Copyright 2000-2001 George Sranko. All rights reserved.
4745 words

To inquire about publishing this article contact the author